Current location:sport >>
US Supreme Court Skeptical of Curbing Government Contact With Social Media Firms
sport9People have gathered around
IntroductionWashington —A majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court appeared skeptical on Monday of efforts ...
A majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court appeared skeptical on Monday of efforts to impose restrictions on federal government efforts to curb misinformation online.
Both conservative and liberal justices on the nine-member court appeared reluctant to endorse a lower court's ruling that would severely limit government interactions with social media companies.
The case stems from a lawsuit brought by the Republican attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, who allege that government officials went too far in their bid to get platforms to combat vaccine and election misinformation, violating the First Amendment free speech rights of users.
The lower court restricted top officials and agencies of Democratic President Joe Biden's administration from meeting and communicating with social media companies to moderate their content.
The ruling, which the Supreme Court put on hold until it heard the case, was a win for conservative advocates who allege that the government pressured or colluded with platforms such as Facebook and X, formerly Twitter, to censor right-leaning content under the guise of fighting misinformation.
Representing the Justice Department in the Supreme Court on Monday, Principal Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher said there is a "fundamental distinction between persuasion and coercion."
"The government may not use coercive threats to suppress speech, but it is entitled to speak for itself by informing, persuading or criticizing private speakers," he said.
The lower court, Fletcher said, "mistook persuasion for coercion."
Justice Samuel Alito, a conservative, said the record showed that government officials had engaged in "constant pestering of Facebook and some of the other platforms," treating them "like their subordinates."
"I cannot imagine federal officials taking that approach to the print media," Alito said.
But Chief Justice John Roberts, also a conservative, said the federal government does not speak with one voice.
"The government is not monolithic," Roberts said. "That has to dilute the concept of coercion significantly, doesn't it?"
Fletcher said interactions between health officials and social media platforms at the heart of the case needed to be viewed in light of "an effort to get Americans vaccinated during a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic."
"There was a concern that Americans were getting their news about the vaccine from these platforms and the platforms were promoting bad information," Fletcher said, adding that "the platforms were moderating content long before the government was talking to them."
'No place in our democracy'
J. Benjamin Aguinaga, the solicitor general of Louisiana, denounced what he called "government censorship," saying it has "no place in our democracy."
"The government has no right to persuade platforms to violate Americans' constitutional rights, and pressuring platforms in backrooms shielded from public view is not using the bully pulpit at all," Aguinaga said. "That's just being a bully."
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a liberal, pushed back, saying "my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways."
"Some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country." she said.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, asked whether it would be coercion if someone in government calls up a social media company to point out something that is "factually erroneous information."
The lower court order applied to the White House and a slew of agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Department, the Justice Department as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The decision of the lower court restricted agencies and officials from meeting with social media companies or flagging posts.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry hailed the lower court’s "historic injunction" at the time, saying it would prevent the Biden administration from “censoring the core political speech of ordinary Americans" on social media.
He accused federal officials of seeking to “dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government and more."
Some experts in misinformation and First Amendment law criticized the lower court ruling, saying that authorities needed to strike a balance between calling out falsehoods and veering toward censorship or curbing free speech.
Tags:
Reprint:Friends are welcome to share on the Internet, but please indicate the source of the article when reprinting it.“Global Gateway news portal”。http://saudiarabia.arandomquote.com/html-52e899882.html
Related articles
Grant Shapps vows he WILL find more planes for mass parachute drop to mark 80th anniversary of D
sportGrant Shapps today vowed to find more planes for a mass parachute jump to mark the 80th anniversary ...
【sport】
Read moreMike Trout leading majors in home runs, but is looking for more consistency at the plate
sportANAHEIM, Calif. (AP) — Mike Trout is the first player in the major leagues this season to reach 10 h ...
【sport】
Read moreCaptain Tom's scandal
sportCaptain Tom's scandal-hit daughter Hannah Ingram-Moore has been seen for the first time since puttin ...
【sport】
Read more
Popular articles
- Everybody may love Raymond, but Ray Romano loves Peter Boyle
- Bears banking on Caleb Williams after taking the 2022 Heisman winner with No. 1 pick in NFL draft
- Man City beats Brighton 4
- How a boy's offer of one dollar to a 'homeless man' sparked an incredible friendship
- Mark Wahlberg's new action
- Buccaneers add offensive line help, select Duke C Graham Barton in NFL draft
Latest articles
Joe Rogan's 'brain
Art on the lips at hippiest cultural district in Hong Kong
Driver charged with negligent homicide in fiery crash that shut down Connecticut highway bridge
Avalanche goalie Alexandar Georgiev hoping confidence boost carries into Game 3 against Jets
LeBron James UNFOLLOWS Diddy on Instagram after video of assault on ex
Man shoots his friend dead for taking a bite out of his girlfriend's burger
LINKS
- Xi Sends Congratulatory Letter to Forum on Global Human Rights Governance
- Explainer: Learn About China from Continuity of Chinese Civilization
- U.S. urged to stop sending wrong signals to 'Taiwan independence' separatist forces
- World Insights: How China Strives to Improve Global Human Rights Governance for a Better World
- Emperor Qinshihuang museum launches online ticket platform for overseas tourists
- Xi Stresses Improving Quality of Party's Organizational Work
- An area of exceptional taste
- GLOBALink
- Guizhou mountain tourism is peak treat
- China unifies medicine catalog covered by medical insurance